The world is tired of Jews

Haim Sokolin

                  Haim Sokolin

                  The world is tired of Jews

The world is tired of Jews.

Charles Krauthammer,

                                                                                                        

I do not believe anybody was slandered more than the Jews.  For two thousand years they serve the object of slander and accusations of anything. 

Fidel Castro, September, 2010

The Jewish question is an axis around which history is revolving.

Nikolai  Berdyaev, 1927

The world is tired of Jews. This being said, the world needs them very much. Not, however, as an equal member of the world community and a partner. This status, as is well known, belongs to other countries and peoples. But not to the Jews and not to Israel. Israel and the Jews, as it is equally well known, are relegated to a different status, the one of a continuous pervasive irritant and a scape goat. The words of Castro quoted in the epigraph come from his recent interview to an American magazine, the «Atlantic». The same could be said by Obama, Sarkozy, Merkel, Queen Elisabeth (I forgot the name of her Prime Minister), Putin and all the rest of the world leaders including even the blinded by anti-Semitism Swedes and Norwegians. But the world heard this confession from a relic Communist under whose leadership Cuba in decades automatically voted in the UN for any anti-Israeli resolution in the full knowledge that it was the next «slander and accusation of anything». Exactly the same way as it was done by all other Latin American, African, Asian and many European countries. Castro always knew it; it is not that he all of a sudden saw the light. But his words forced Israeli leaders, not used to such sudden rejection of hypocrisy, into slobbering. «I thank you from the bottom of my heart» - President Shimon Peres wrote to him in his own hand. There is something in it reminding of a familiar everyday situation when a defenseless victim is for a long time bullied by the «entire collective» mired in drunkenness and robbery, and all of a sudden at a moment of sobering up one of the marginal members of the collective is stating magnanimously: «Okay, you may live. You have been unfairly badgered».  And the victim wholeheartedly gives thanks to an unexpected advocate.

The world community is a highly unstable socioeconomic and political system.  It is shaken by large and small wars, revolutions, crises, mutual bones to pick between countries, and natural catastrophes. All these accumulate stress pregnant with blowups and unintended consequences. In such an environment the peoples and their leaders need efficient valve allowing once in a while to lower pressure within the system and bleed it in a safe direction. As we are speaking about the community of the peoples such valve may be only some people. The Jewish people and Israel ideally match the role. A numerically insignificant people dispersed among many countries, intellectually and socially active, therefore unavoidably having its share both in successes and failures of various social experiments. And at that traditionally passive in providing for its own security. 

The country of this people is territorially among the most miniature on the planet. It is continuously fighting for its existence but dubbed by the label of most aggressive, imperialist, colonizer, oppressing the occupied Palestinian people.  An additional irritating factor is that the Jewish people has more historical rights to this shred of land than the Americans, Canadians and Australians have for the territories of their countries. More than England for the Northern Ireland and Scotland. More than immigrants from Spain and Portugal for the South America. More than Russia for the Caucasus, Siberia, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands. This is not to question political map of the world but just to state the commonly known facts.

We’ll state, for the sake of an «intellectual game» and as a theoretically possible alternative to the «Jewish irritant», some other peoples and communities actually responsible after 1945 for wars, conflicts, stress foci, international terrorism, piracy and other problems of the modern world.  And we’ll show why they cannot substitute for the Jews in this unique role.

1.  The aggressive Islam, which had openly placed its bets on the global jihad and demographic expansion in the western countries.   Not too much time remains until the demographic and political maps of Europe and then America will change beyond all recognition.  Arab petroleum producing countries more than once blackmailed the world by cutting down on oil deliveries and artificially caused its shortage.   One would think, isn’t it an irritant for the world community?  But the Islamic world is a hard nut to crack for a gerontic Europe, and now also for America whose president is not hiding his firm Muslim roots. 

2.  Even a backward Iran, with one leg in the Dark Ages, threw a daring challenge to the West being certain in its impunity.  This is also a nice irritant but, as opposed to Israel, absolutely insusceptible to the so-called world public opinion.  Gentlemen prefer not to get involved with rowdies who do not recognize good manners.

3.  Russia waged a bloody war without rules in Chechnya, and before that in Afghanistan.  Mind you, Afghanistan had not shot a single rocket at Russia. It looks like Chechnya under Dudayev also did not shoot at Stavropol and Pyatigorsk. But Russia certainly cannot replace Israel in the capacity of a world trouble-maker. A suicidal idea would never cross their minds in the UN or with all kinds of green human rights activists to conduct investigations of «inadequate actions» by the Russian army in Afghanistan and in the Caucasus, the investigations they enthusiastically started after the operation «Cast lead» in Gaza. We’ll remind the reader that the Soviet Union before its disintegration was major sponsor of the Arab terror against Israel. Thereafter, by the twist of fate (and most likely on an equity basis) the Muslim terror, as a boomerang, hit Russia.

4.  Which one of the contestants is remaining there?  North Korea flailing the atomic bomb and having sunk in broad daylight a South Korean military vessel?  No way. It is protected by China. And China is not to be trifled with.  Somalia pirates?  Well, this is just laughable. Should it have turned out that they were trained by a cranky unemployed Israeli green beret…  That would have been totally different!  Then UN and Europe would have been in a whirl.  But as it is now – let them play cowboys and Indians …

In a medieval Europe the Jews were accused of poisoning wells and spreading plague and cholera.  And many of them have been killed for this.  Just the Jews, not the French, Italians or Germans. Although, it would appear, why could not representatives of the indigenous peoples engage in this jolly business?  Should it have happened in our times, the inefficient Israeli propaganda would have certainly gotten beans for again losing the information war. The reader perhaps thinks that I intentionally am carrying the situation ad absurdum. After all, the medieval obscurantism is finished forever.  Is it?  For instance, currently in Russia was published the modern textbook of 1917 – 2009 history. It maintains that the revolution of 1917 was not a Russian revolution but a revolution of the «small people» (the Russian euphemism for the Jews) who in their self-interest plunged the country into an abyss of the Civil war. Leonid Radzikhovsky called this book a manual of scientific anti-Semitism. As the Civil war is no different in the number of victims from a plague and cholera epidemics, the conclusion is self-evident.  Instead of poisoning the wells – the Civil war.  By-the-way,  poisoning was also involved. But that was later, when they exposed Jewish doctors-poisoners. I will add that a textbook like this could not have been published without the Kremlin’s approval.

Another example. Everybody knows what catastrophic financial-economic crisis Greece is currently in. 23 December, 2010 an influential Greek metropolitan Seraphim (Rusophulos), a second in importance in the Greek religious hierarchy, stated in his speech on the national TV that the country’s economy has been collapsed by the Greek Jews. I will note that among the 11 million of the Greek population there are only 5 thousand Jews (0.045%). These are mostly people of liberal professions (painters, actors, musicians and journalists). But it’s okay, they managed to collapse it.  And what for? This is a totally different issue (read the «Protocols of the elders of Zion» or contraptions by Prokhanov and Shevchenko, the major currently living Russian experts on the Jews). 

That is the way the wheel of history is rolling – not a single country, not a single epoch can get by without the Jews, without this eternal irritant and culprit in all troubles and sufferings (even retrospectively when needed) of all unsuccessful peoples beginning with medieval Europeans and then in the XX century the Germans, Russians, Palestinians. What would the world be doing without the Jews? Who would the UN appoint the troublemaker, scorcher of the order and peaceful life of the family of the peoples? The Persians, Somalians, Kurds, Gypsies, Papuans, Rwanda Tutsi and  Hutu? There are many peoples but nobody to choose from!  Maybe refined Muslim al–Qaeda? But let us stop jesting so maliciously… These are just bad Muslims not reflecting aspirations of most of their coreligionists as politcorrect Euro-Americans maintain. And the humankind just cannot get by without a universal irritant and constant culprit. This has to be understood. Even the legendary Fidel understood it by the end of his long revolutionary life.  And for this reason we have nowhere to hide from this role.  This is a unanimous desire of the peoples in the entire world. May be thanked Christ and Allah that there are the Jews, God’s blood!  

I will remind the reader of a joke, well-known and equally reasonable:   ancient Eskimos did not know that the Jews existed, so they blamed natural phenomena for their troubles and misfortunes. In this respect the modern peoples, including great ones (or rather numerically abundant) are a step above the ancient Eskimos.  They know exactly who is at fault. Some of them even know what has to be done.  But they do not know exactly how.  Except for the Arabs who are still counting on long knives and on the Mediterranean (Ahmad Shukairi, Arafat’s predecessor as head of PLO, stated on the eve of the Six Days War: «When we liberate Palestine we will help the surviving Jews to return to the countries of exodus. But I doubt that anybody will survive»).

Of course, in a subjective Jewish viewpoint some deeds with the plus sign could serve as some justification of our existence on the planet.  Well, for instance the vaccines against plague and cholera of Vladimir Havkin (as a compensation for their spread in the Middle Ages) or against polio of Jonas Salk. There were also Gertrude Elion (the medicine against leukemia), Paul Ehrlich (against syphilis), and Baruch Blumberg (vaccine against hepatitis B). And innumerous other discoveries and inventions in science and technology, which are used by hundreds of millions including some anti-Semites. It is possible that the latter are doing it simply because of ignorance. Because should they have known that Doctor Salk was a Jew they would have hardly allowed vaccinating their children. The author understands that his reference to the outstanding achievements of «this nation» in science and technology is very vulnerable to criticism.  «So what, - those disagreeing would say. – Well, they invented, well, they discovered … Some others, from a different nation, would do at least as well». And this is hard to argue against.  Discoveries and inventions -  are a matter of chance.  Maybe they just were lucky… But the Great October Socialist Revolution, which brought innumerable sufferings to the Russian people,  could be committed only by the Jews. Another example. Who else but the Jews could have done so much bad harm to the Germans and have forced them to suffer so deeply that just in six years they turned from ostensibly «civilized, cultured people» into a tribe of brutal murderers (Goebbels: «The Jews inflicted on us so much suffering that the most severe punishment, which they can be subjected to, still will be too  mild»).  Only the Jews are equal to such global projects. And this has to be paid for – both in the past and in the present. Paid to the maximum, no place for bargaining. 

The main bill was presented by the long-suffering German people. The Germans with a hilarious pig squealing were joined by the equally suffering Ukrainians, Poles, Rumanians, Hungarians and all kinds of European sundries (the Croatians, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians), all those who were never condemned of introducing even barely noticeable contribution in the cultural and spiritual life of mankind, in the development of science and technology. By joint effort they erected a project of the century named «The final solution», which became known after the war as Holocaust.  To be fair it should be noted that in actuality it was a joint Euro-American project. Although Switzerland, England, USA and Canada did not advertise their participation in the project, the policies of their governments leave no doubts that they were observing events in the occupied Europe with interest and even propitious attention.  After the war, in order to paste in at least one bright page into the already formatted black book of extermination of the European Jewry, has been invented a beautiful «Andersen’s fairy tale» about how a noble Denmark was saving her Jews. But recently published study by Peter Nannestad, a politology professor at the Aarhus University in Copenhagen, destroyed this only one European legend. The king, contrary to the fairy tale, did not go into the street with a yellow star on his chest and did not do any statements of solidarity with the Jews (he was connected by «special relationships» with the Germans). And the Danish fishermen transported them to Sweden not for free but for huge money. The established rate was up to $100,000 and even greater (in present-day dollars) for a couple. Most people did not have such money and were paying off their saviors under the debt notes many years after the war, sometimes through the end of their lives. Nannestad’s conclusion is: «In the final analysis we are no better and no worse than the other nations».

Currently, as we know the genuine facts and documents, it is possible to assert that the allied policies in the Jewish question were not to prevent Germany from doing the dirty job. Initially it was made to understand «in the sign language» that the «free world» was not concerned too much with the fate of the German Jews (1938: shameful Evian conference; 1939: the story of motor ship «St Louis» and the rejection by the US Congress of a bill allowing the entry from Germany to twenty thousand Jewish children aged up to 14 years). Then, already during the war, a stubborn refusal by Churchill and Roosevelt to bomb juncture stations and access railroads to the death camps.  There was not a single grave warning to the German government and German people about the responsibility for the crimes after the war. The information about the scale of the Jewish extermination was hidden under the pretext of impossibility to reliably verify it, which was notorious lie. A polling conducted in 1942 in the USA showed that for one American considering the Germans as the main threat to the country there were four believing that was the Jews. Roosevelt could not  but take into consideration the mood of his electorate. Anyway, if the allies have no Jewish blood on their hands there was smoke, and there is no smoke without fire.

After the war there was a brief period of «unanimous horror and shudder» from what the Germans have done. The surviving Jews for a while were not bothered by «continuous slander and accusations»  (after Castro) and were even allowed to form their own tiny state. But soon enough the «world community» recognized  its  mistake. The first to regain consciousness was the Soviet Union, which understood that Israel had no intent to become its foothold in the Middle East.  From that moment on the Middle-Eastern policy of Stalin and his successors became rabidly anti-Israel, directed toward the destruction of a young country by Arab hands, and in 1968 was planned also the independent rocket nuclear attack from a submarine.  The plans of the Kremlin gang have been disrupted by unexpected events in Czechoslovakia.

All these were accompanied by stirring of anti-Semitism unheard of in the entire Russian history. Stalin, this ignorant, blood-thirsty and psychically flawed ruler (the most recent wanton definition: «effective manager») of a huge long-suffering people, was preparing it to the completion within his empire of the cause begun by Hitler. Only his death prevented the implementation of this plan. Somewhat later countries of the so-called «free world» also came to a conclusion that the existence of a strong Israel is not desirable. Albeit in form their actions differed with the crude policies of the Soviet empire, the objective was the same. It was manifested most openly on the eve of the Six-days war. Israel then was totally encircled by the armies of several Arab countries much exceeding the Israeli army in personnel and hardware and Nasser and other Arab leaders openly stated their intent to totally eliminate the «Zionist formation».  At that fateful for Israel moment the world kept ominous silence, foretasting a tragic outcome. Naval powers did not fulfill their obligation to ensure freedom of navigation in the Straits of Tiran and France even tried to tie hands to Israel by exhorting it «not to make a first shot». After Israel has won De Gaulle could not hide his anger and declared embargo on supplies to the country of weapons and spare parts. A next all-European attempt to finish with Israel, this time well-coordinated, was undertaken in the heat of the Yom Kippur War (1973) when the army was bleeding white and acutely needed deliveries of the American weapons without which it would be difficult to hold it out. Those days all European «democratic» (!) countries, without a single exception, rejected the request by President Nixon and forbade the intermediate landing in their territories for the American transport planes with the weapons for Israel.  The situation then has been saved by still at the time «totalitarian» (!) Portugal, which allowed the American transports to land on the Azores. This again barred the European dice and destroyed the «European dream».

Since then the world changed the tactic. Attempts, unending to these days, were begun to delegitimize and isolate Israel. Currently these attempts reached unheard-of scale and turned into a campaign of pathological slander and hate from the left, right, green and all the rest of the European political and social spectrum. In the lead are traditionally anti-Semitic countries as well as the new ones, which unexpectedly perceived the taste to this business although very few Jews are residing there (Sweden, Norway, Spain). Demonstrative is a testimony by an Israeli diplomat, Zvi Mazel in a recent interview to a journalist Alexander Maystrovoy: «Nowhere else did I encounter such hate to Israel as with the Swedish greens». He is saying further: «The Europeans know that they are heading to the annihilation of Israel and are in consent with that». A question arises: «What do they need it for?» The only possible answer is in returning the situation with the Jews to the previous convenient status when there was the Jewish diaspora and there was no Israel. In those blessed times each country could do with its Jews anything it needed in the environment of a «current political moment» (to set up the Dreyfus affair, the Beilis affair, the murderer-doctors affair; to begin the fight for  «limpieza de sangre»; to accuse the Jews in economic and social difficulties and who knows where else the Jews could come in handy - even, in case of a very strong urge, in a ritual killing somewhere in a  small  village). Nobody cancelled the «Protocols of the Elders of Zion», and in those is a complete set of crimes against humanity. But the existence of Israel is a strong impediment, sometimes even a total ban of such easy games al fresco. If somebody reproaches the author in reviving chimeras from a distant past he would advise to look at what we were accused of just in the recent years. The range is broad: dropping poisoned chocolates from choppers in Gaza and cutting the organs by Israeli doctors in the earthquake victims in Haiti to the destruction of Twin Towers in New York. And as for the fabrication of the Holocaust one may listen not only to the half-witted Persian but also to the so-called «revisionist historians» (David Irving and his like). Therefore, the suggested response to the question «What for do they need it?»  appears to be without self-contradictions and logical. If only just to exclude one important factor:  there is now not a doubt in anybody’s mind that the total Islamization of Europe is just a matter of time. The official governmental forecasts are that under the current demographic trend France will become an Islamic state in 2049 and Germany, in 2050.  Again, the words of Zvi Mazel: «One Italian politician recently told me: “Europe accepted its destiny. It does not want to fight the terror and does not attempt to stop the wave of Islamization, which will soon drown it. You are on your own, my friend“».  In light of this critical circumstance my dissertations about the reasons why Europe may be willing to liquidate Israel become somewhat questionable (even strange). It would appear, what business does it have with Israel if the Europeans themselves, in their own countries, in a quite foreseeable future may turn into national minorities and convert in this respect into «new Jews»?  Such will be the fate of those who will not be willing to wear the veil and stand dog-style bottom up in the streets of Paris, London, Berlin and other cities of the future European Caliphates.  But here enters another important factor, inertia of thinking. Nobody is willing to think about tomorrow even if it is no longer impossible not to notice the fiery writing on the wall, and there is more than enough unequivocal warnings of the European imams. That is why the Europeans prefer to remain imprisoned by old customary stereotypes: all evil comes from the Jews; fighting them is the main task of genuine liberals, left, right, democrats, anarchists, anti-globalists, defenders of the ambient environment, protectors of rare animals, birds and butterflies (please pardon me those whom I missed). Vesuvius has already effused its renowned mushroom cloud described by Pliny the Younger but Pompeii continues to live its usual life.  Tomorrow will be «The last day of Pompeii».

In the light of this situation and such perspective whatever Israel does or does not do has no importance whatsoever. It may return to 1967 borders, give away East Jerusalem (and the Golan Heights to Syria) and accept Palestinian refugees.  It will not lower by even an iota the incandescence of anti-Semitism in Europe and efforts for its further isolation and delegitimizing. And it certainly will not bring peace to the Middle East. But Israel’s strategic position will be weakened so that its survival will become problematic.  The result will be exactly the same if the country does not do any concessions. But in this case its defense capacity will remain at an acceptable level.

And another conclusion from all of these. It also is not important what efforts Israel will (or will not) make in the area of propaganda, information warfare and explaining its position. There is nobody to talk with. Potential opponents are irreversibly zombified and are unwilling to listen to any reasoning. I will again refer to Zvi Mazel:  «Israeli diplomats in their conversations with Europeans constantly appeal to the common sense and political expediency. They are stressing that Israel is the only democratic state in the Middle East friendly to the Europeans. Appeal to understanding of our problems. All sink into a void. They refuse to listen and to hear».  The time will elapse and the view of Europeans will no longer have any significance. They will be replaced by the Muslims whose opinion is well known and to talk with whom will be useless.   

Such is political and strategic reality. That is how the situation is seen  by a rank and file citizen living in Jerusalem. I do not have access to secret documents, I do not know what is going on in the Middle-Eastern, European and American corridors of power, I in general know little in this respect. But I know the Jewish and  Arab history. I know well the European history of the last century full of treachery, fatal errors and megalomania of the countries which long ago became second class and even morally Lilliputian. I observed at a close distance the disintegration of the Soviet empire. I am carefully watching a surprising but quite predictable degeneration of America. All these combined provide huge information for thought and allow making a substantiated conclusion about Israel.

Israel’s situation is better than that of Europe. In the near future it will be the only non-Muslim state in a huge region covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. To survive, Israel needs the following: 1. No territorial concessions; 2. Consolidate settlements in Judea and Samaria; 3. Solve the problem of Israeli Arabs;  4. Develop and create conceptually new effective weapons – nuclear, laser, psychotronic, cyber, etc. As for the external propaganda and the «explanation of own position», they do not deserve any hope, therefore no money and human resources should be wasted on them. Israel does not have listeners and interlocutors. Same way as Czechoslovakia did not have them in 1938.

A strong Israel will be able to survive as an unassailable island in the Islamic sea and wait until a New European Reconquista. It is unavoidable as in the history «everything that goes around comes around». How long will we have to wait?  Judge for yourselves. As mentioned, first major European countries (Germany and France) will fall under the power of Islam in the middle of the century. Another twenty years, perhaps less will take Islamization of the rest of Europe. This takes us to 2070. At the  same  time  the  historically built-in internecline muslim  wars  will  break  out.   The Reconquista in the 8-th century began eight years after the Arabs conquered Pyrenean Peninsula. The start of the next taking back of Europe will not be longer to wait. The role of the Jews in this «project» will also change. Whereas in the 8-th century they were Arab allies, in the 21-th century they will be their opponents.  Who knows, perhaps that will be a decisive factor…  Be it as it may, about the year 2080 the new Reconquista will begin. Just seventy years from our time. An  insignificant  time interval in the Jewish history.  Lehaim!

                              

Translation  of  the  article  in   Russian  dated  October, 2010   

Haim  Sokolin    haim08@012.net.il

The world is tired of Jews.

Charles Krauthammer,

                                                                                                        

I do not believe anybody was slandered more than the Jews.  For two thousand years they serve the object of slander and accusations of anything. 

Fidel Castro, September, 2010

The Jewish question is an axis around which history is revolving.

Nikolai  Berdyaev, 1927

The world is tired of Jews. This being said, the world needs them very much. Not, however, as an equal member of the world community and a partner. This status, as is well known, belongs to other countries and peoples. But not to the Jews and not to Israel. Israel and the Jews, as it is equally well known, are relegated to a different status, the one of a continuous pervasive irritant and a scape goat. The words of Castro quoted in the epigraph come from his recent interview to an American magazine, the «Atlantic». The same could be said by Obama, Sarkozy, Merkel, Queen Elisabeth (I forgot the name of her Prime Minister), Putin and all the rest of the world leaders including even the blinded by anti-Semitism Swedes and Norwegians. But the world heard this confession from a relic Communist under whose leadership Cuba in decades automatically voted in the UN for any anti-Israeli resolution in the full knowledge that it was the next «slander and accusation of anything». Exactly the same way as it was done by all other Latin American, African, Asian and many European countries. Castro always knew it; it is not that he all of a sudden saw the light. But his words forced Israeli leaders, not used to such sudden rejection of hypocrisy, into slobbering. «I thank you from the bottom of my heart» - President Shimon Peres wrote to him in his own hand. There is something in it reminding of a familiar everyday situation when a defenseless victim is for a long time bullied by the «entire collective» mired in drunkenness and robbery, and all of a sudden at a moment of sobering up one of the marginal members of the collective is stating magnanimously: «Okay, you may live. You have been unfairly badgered».  And the victim wholeheartedly gives thanks to an unexpected advocate.

The world community is a highly unstable socioeconomic and political system.  It is shaken by large and small wars, revolutions, crises, mutual bones to pick between countries, and natural catastrophes. All these accumulate stress pregnant with blowups and unintended consequences. In such an environment the peoples and their leaders need efficient valve allowing once in a while to lower pressure within the system and bleed it in a safe direction. As we are speaking about the community of the peoples such valve may be only some people. The Jewish people and Israel ideally match the role. A numerically insignificant people dispersed among many countries, intellectually and socially active, therefore unavoidably having its share both in successes and failures of various social experiments. And at that traditionally passive in providing for its own security. 

The country of this people is territorially among the most miniature on the planet. It is continuously fighting for its existence but dubbed by the label of most aggressive, imperialist, colonizer, oppressing the occupied Palestinian people.  An additional irritating factor is that the Jewish people has more historical rights to this shred of land than the Americans, Canadians and Australians have for the territories of their countries. More than England for the Northern Ireland and Scotland. More than immigrants from Spain and Portugal for the South America. More than Russia for the Caucasus, Siberia, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands. This is not to question political map of the world but just to state the commonly known facts.

We’ll state, for the sake of an «intellectual game» and as a theoretically possible alternative to the «Jewish irritant», some other peoples and communities actually responsible after 1945 for wars, conflicts, stress foci, international terrorism, piracy and other problems of the modern world.  And we’ll show why they cannot substitute for the Jews in this unique role.

1.  The aggressive Islam, which had openly placed its bets on the global jihad and demographic expansion in the western countries.   Not too much time remains until the demographic and political maps of Europe and then America will change beyond all recognition.  Arab petroleum producing countries more than once blackmailed the world by cutting down on oil deliveries and artificially caused its shortage.   One would think, isn’t it an irritant for the world community?  But the Islamic world is a hard nut to crack for a gerontic Europe, and now also for America whose president is not hiding his firm Muslim roots. 

2.  Even a backward Iran, with one leg in the Dark Ages, threw a daring challenge to the West being certain in its impunity.  This is also a nice irritant but, as opposed to Israel, absolutely insusceptible to the so-called world public opinion.  Gentlemen prefer not to get involved with rowdies who do not recognize good manners.

3.  Russia waged a bloody war without rules in Chechnya, and before that in Afghanistan.  Mind you, Afghanistan had not shot a single rocket at Russia. It looks like Chechnya under Dudayev also did not shoot at Stavropol and Pyatigorsk. But Russia certainly cannot replace Israel in the capacity of a world trouble-maker. A suicidal idea would never cross their minds in the UN or with all kinds of green human rights activists to conduct investigations of «inadequate actions» by the Russian army in Afghanistan and in the Caucasus, the investigations they enthusiastically started after the operation «Cast lead» in Gaza. We’ll remind the reader that the Soviet Union before its disintegration was major sponsor of the Arab terror against Israel. Thereafter, by the twist of fate (and most likely on an equity basis) the Muslim terror, as a boomerang, hit Russia.

4.  Which one of the contestants is remaining there?  North Korea flailing the atomic bomb and having sunk in broad daylight a South Korean military vessel?  No way. It is protected by China. And China is not to be trifled with.  Somalia pirates?  Well, this is just laughable. Should it have turned out that they were trained by a cranky unemployed Israeli green beret…  That would have been totally different!  Then UN and Europe would have been in a whirl.  But as it is now – let them play cowboys and Indians …

In a medieval Europe the Jews were accused of poisoning wells and spreading plague and cholera.  And many of them have been killed for this.  Just the Jews, not the French, Italians or Germans. Although, it would appear, why could not representatives of the indigenous peoples engage in this jolly business?  Should it have happened in our times, the inefficient Israeli propaganda would have certainly gotten beans for again losing the information war. The reader perhaps thinks that I intentionally am carrying the situation ad absurdum. After all, the medieval obscurantism is finished forever.  Is it?  For instance, currently in Russia was published the modern textbook of 1917 – 2009 history. It maintains that the revolution of 1917 was not a Russian revolution but a revolution of the «small people» (the Russian euphemism for the Jews) who in their self-interest plunged the country into an abyss of the Civil war. Leonid Radzikhovsky called this book a manual of scientific anti-Semitism. As the Civil war is no different in the number of victims from a plague and cholera epidemics, the conclusion is self-evident.  Instead of poisoning the wells – the Civil war.  By-the-way,  poisoning was also involved. But that was later, when they exposed Jewish doctors-poisoners. I will add that a textbook like this could not have been published without the Kremlin’s approval.

Another example. Everybody knows what catastrophic financial-economic crisis Greece is currently in. 23 December, 2010 an influential Greek metropolitan Seraphim (Rusophulos), a second in importance in the Greek religious hierarchy, stated in his speech on the national TV that the country’s economy has been collapsed by the Greek Jews. I will note that among the 11 million of the Greek population there are only 5 thousand Jews (0.045%). These are mostly people of liberal professions (painters, actors, musicians and journalists). But it’s okay, they managed to collapse it.  And what for? This is a totally different issue (read the «Protocols of the elders of Zion» or contraptions by Prokhanov and Shevchenko, the major currently living Russian experts on the Jews). 

That is the way the wheel of history is rolling – not a single country, not a single epoch can get by without the Jews, without this eternal irritant and culprit in all troubles and sufferings (even retrospectively when needed) of all unsuccessful peoples beginning with medieval Europeans and then in the XX century the Germans, Russians, Palestinians. What would the world be doing without the Jews? Who would the UN appoint the troublemaker, scorcher of the order and peaceful life of the family of the peoples? The Persians, Somalians, Kurds, Gypsies, Papuans, Rwanda Tutsi and  Hutu? There are many peoples but nobody to choose from!  Maybe refined Muslim al–Qaeda? But let us stop jesting so maliciously… These are just bad Muslims not reflecting aspirations of most of their coreligionists as politcorrect Euro-Americans maintain. And the humankind just cannot get by without a universal irritant and constant culprit. This has to be understood. Even the legendary Fidel understood it by the end of his long revolutionary life.  And for this reason we have nowhere to hide from this role.  This is a unanimous desire of the peoples in the entire world. May be thanked Christ and Allah that there are the Jews, God’s blood!  

I will remind the reader of a joke, well-known and equally reasonable:   ancient Eskimos did not know that the Jews existed, so they blamed natural phenomena for their troubles and misfortunes. In this respect the modern peoples, including great ones (or rather numerically abundant) are a step above the ancient Eskimos.  They know exactly who is at fault. Some of them even know what has to be done.  But they do not know exactly how.  Except for the Arabs who are still counting on long knives and on the Mediterranean (Ahmad Shukairi, Arafat’s predecessor as head of PLO, stated on the eve of the Six Days War: «When we liberate Palestine we will help the surviving Jews to return to the countries of exodus. But I doubt that anybody will survive»).

Of course, in a subjective Jewish viewpoint some deeds with the plus sign could serve as some justification of our existence on the planet.  Well, for instance the vaccines against plague and cholera of Vladimir Havkin (as a compensation for their spread in the Middle Ages) or against polio of Jonas Salk. There were also Gertrude Elion (the medicine against leukemia), Paul Ehrlich (against syphilis), and Baruch Blumberg (vaccine against hepatitis B). And innumerous other discoveries and inventions in science and technology, which are used by hundreds of millions including some anti-Semites. It is possible that the latter are doing it simply because of ignorance. Because should they have known that Doctor Salk was a Jew they would have hardly allowed vaccinating their children. The author understands that his reference to the outstanding achievements of «this nation» in science and technology is very vulnerable to criticism.  «So what, - those disagreeing would say. – Well, they invented, well, they discovered … Some others, from a different nation, would do at least as well». And this is hard to argue against.  Discoveries and inventions -  are a matter of chance.  Maybe they just were lucky… But the Great October Socialist Revolution, which brought innumerable sufferings to the Russian people,  could be committed only by the Jews. Another example. Who else but the Jews could have done so much bad harm to the Germans and have forced them to suffer so deeply that just in six years they turned from ostensibly «civilized, cultured people» into a tribe of brutal murderers (Goebbels: «The Jews inflicted on us so much suffering that the most severe punishment, which they can be subjected to, still will be too  mild»).  Only the Jews are equal to such global projects. And this has to be paid for – both in the past and in the present. Paid to the maximum, no place for bargaining. 

The main bill was presented by the long-suffering German people. The Germans with a hilarious pig squealing were joined by the equally suffering Ukrainians, Poles, Rumanians, Hungarians and all kinds of European sundries (the Croatians, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians), all those who were never condemned of introducing even barely noticeable contribution in the cultural and spiritual life of mankind, in the development of science and technology. By joint effort they erected a project of the century named «The final solution», which became known after the war as Holocaust.  To be fair it should be noted that in actuality it was a joint Euro-American project. Although Switzerland, England, USA and Canada did not advertise their participation in the project, the policies of their governments leave no doubts that they were observing events in the occupied Europe with interest and even propitious attention.  After the war, in order to paste in at least one bright page into the already formatted black book of extermination of the European Jewry, has been invented a beautiful «Andersen’s fairy tale» about how a noble Denmark was saving her Jews. But recently published study by Peter Nannestad, a politology professor at the Aarhus University in Copenhagen, destroyed this only one European legend. The king, contrary to the fairy tale, did not go into the street with a yellow star on his chest and did not do any statements of solidarity with the Jews (he was connected by «special relationships» with the Germans). And the Danish fishermen transported them to Sweden not for free but for huge money. The established rate was up to $100,000 and even greater (in present-day dollars) for a couple. Most people did not have such money and were paying off their saviors under the debt notes many years after the war, sometimes through the end of their lives. Nannestad’s conclusion is: «In the final analysis we are no better and no worse than the other nations».

Currently, as we know the genuine facts and documents, it is possible to assert that the allied policies in the Jewish question were not to prevent Germany from doing the dirty job. Initially it was made to understand «in the sign language» that the «free world» was not concerned too much with the fate of the German Jews (1938: shameful Evian conference; 1939: the story of motor ship «St Louis» and the rejection by the US Congress of a bill allowing the entry from Germany to twenty thousand Jewish children aged up to 14 years). Then, already during the war, a stubborn refusal by Churchill and Roosevelt to bomb juncture stations and access railroads to the death camps.  There was not a single grave warning to the German government and German people about the responsibility for the crimes after the war. The information about the scale of the Jewish extermination was hidden under the pretext of impossibility to reliably verify it, which was notorious lie. A polling conducted in 1942 in the USA showed that for one American considering the Germans as the main threat to the country there were four believing that was the Jews. Roosevelt could not  but take into consideration the mood of his electorate. Anyway, if the allies have no Jewish blood on their hands there was smoke, and there is no smoke without fire.

After the war there was a brief period of «unanimous horror and shudder» from what the Germans have done. The surviving Jews for a while were not bothered by «continuous slander and accusations»  (after Castro) and were even allowed to form their own tiny state. But soon enough the «world community» recognized  its  mistake. The first to regain consciousness was the Soviet Union, which understood that Israel had no intent to become its foothold in the Middle East.  From that moment on the Middle-Eastern policy of Stalin and his successors became rabidly anti-Israel, directed toward the destruction of a young country by Arab hands, and in 1968 was planned also the independent rocket nuclear attack from a submarine.  The plans of the Kremlin gang have been disrupted by unexpected events in Czechoslovakia.

All these were accompanied by stirring of anti-Semitism unheard of in the entire Russian history. Stalin, this ignorant, blood-thirsty and psychically flawed ruler (the most recent wanton definition: «effective manager») of a huge long-suffering people, was preparing it to the completion within his empire of the cause begun by Hitler. Only his death prevented the implementation of this plan. Somewhat later countries of the so-called «free world» also came to a conclusion that the existence of a strong Israel is not desirable. Albeit in form their actions differed with the crude policies of the Soviet empire, the objective was the same. It was manifested most openly on the eve of the Six-days war. Israel then was totally encircled by the armies of several Arab countries much exceeding the Israeli army in personnel and hardware and Nasser and other Arab leaders openly stated their intent to totally eliminate the «Zionist formation».  At that fateful for Israel moment the world kept ominous silence, foretasting a tragic outcome. Naval powers did not fulfill their obligation to ensure freedom of navigation in the Straits of Tiran and France even tried to tie hands to Israel by exhorting it «not to make a first shot». After Israel has won De Gaulle could not hide his anger and declared embargo on supplies to the country of weapons and spare parts. A next all-European attempt to finish with Israel, this time well-coordinated, was undertaken in the heat of the Yom Kippur War (1973) when the army was bleeding white and acutely needed deliveries of the American weapons without which it would be difficult to hold it out. Those days all European «democratic» (!) countries, without a single exception, rejected the request by President Nixon and forbade the intermediate landing in their territories for the American transport planes with the weapons for Israel.  The situation then has been saved by still at the time «totalitarian» (!) Portugal, which allowed the American transports to land on the Azores. This again barred the European dice and destroyed the «European dream».

Since then the world changed the tactic. Attempts, unending to these days, were begun to delegitimize and isolate Israel. Currently these attempts reached unheard-of scale and turned into a campaign of pathological slander and hate from the left, right, green and all the rest of the European political and social spectrum. In the lead are traditionally anti-Semitic countries as well as the new ones, which unexpectedly perceived the taste to this business although very few Jews are residing there (Sweden, Norway, Spain). Demonstrative is a testimony by an Israeli diplomat, Zvi Mazel in a recent interview to a journalist Alexander Maystrovoy: «Nowhere else did I encounter such hate to Israel as with the Swedish greens». He is saying further: «The Europeans know that they are heading to the annihilation of Israel and are in consent with that». A question arises: «What do they need it for?» The only possible answer is in returning the situation with the Jews to the previous convenient status when there was the Jewish diaspora and there was no Israel. In those blessed times each country could do with its Jews anything it needed in the environment of a «current political moment» (to set up the Dreyfus affair, the Beilis affair, the murderer-doctors affair; to begin the fight for  «limpieza de sangre»; to accuse the Jews in economic and social difficulties and who knows where else the Jews could come in handy - even, in case of a very strong urge, in a ritual killing somewhere in a  small  village). Nobody cancelled the «Protocols of the Elders of Zion», and in those is a complete set of crimes against humanity. But the existence of Israel is a strong impediment, sometimes even a total ban of such easy games al fresco. If somebody reproaches the author in reviving chimeras from a distant past he would advise to look at what we were accused of just in the recent years. The range is broad: dropping poisoned chocolates from choppers in Gaza and cutting the organs by Israeli doctors in the earthquake victims in Haiti to the destruction of Twin Towers in New York. And as for the fabrication of the Holocaust one may listen not only to the half-witted Persian but also to the so-called «revisionist historians» (David Irving and his like). Therefore, the suggested response to the question «What for do they need it?»  appears to be without self-contradictions and logical. If only just to exclude one important factor:  there is now not a doubt in anybody’s mind that the total Islamization of Europe is just a matter of time. The official governmental forecasts are that under the current demographic trend France will become an Islamic state in 2049 and Germany, in 2050.  Again, the words of Zvi Mazel: «One Italian politician recently told me: “Europe accepted its destiny. It does not want to fight the terror and does not attempt to stop the wave of Islamization, which will soon drown it. You are on your own, my friend“».  In light of this critical circumstance my dissertations about the reasons why Europe may be willing to liquidate Israel become somewhat questionable (even strange). It would appear, what business does it have with Israel if the Europeans themselves, in their own countries, in a quite foreseeable future may turn into national minorities and convert in this respect into «new Jews»?  Such will be the fate of those who will not be willing to wear the veil and stand dog-style bottom up in the streets of Paris, London, Berlin and other cities of the future European Caliphates.  But here enters another important factor, inertia of thinking. Nobody is willing to think about tomorrow even if it is no longer impossible not to notice the fiery writing on the wall, and there is more than enough unequivocal warnings of the European imams. That is why the Europeans prefer to remain imprisoned by old customary stereotypes: all evil comes from the Jews; fighting them is the main task of genuine liberals, left, right, democrats, anarchists, anti-globalists, defenders of the ambient environment, protectors of rare animals, birds and butterflies (please pardon me those whom I missed). Vesuvius has already effused its renowned mushroom cloud described by Pliny the Younger but Pompeii continues to live its usual life.  Tomorrow will be «The last day of Pompeii».

In the light of this situation and such perspective whatever Israel does or does not do has no importance whatsoever. It may return to 1967 borders, give away East Jerusalem (and the Golan Heights to Syria) and accept Palestinian refugees.  It will not lower by even an iota the incandescence of anti-Semitism in Europe and efforts for its further isolation and delegitimizing. And it certainly will not bring peace to the Middle East. But Israel’s strategic position will be weakened so that its survival will become problematic.  The result will be exactly the same if the country does not do any concessions. But in this case its defense capacity will remain at an acceptable level.

And another conclusion from all of these. It also is not important what efforts Israel will (or will not) make in the area of propaganda, information warfare and explaining its position. There is nobody to talk with. Potential opponents are irreversibly zombified and are unwilling to listen to any reasoning. I will again refer to Zvi Mazel:  «Israeli diplomats in their conversations with Europeans constantly appeal to the common sense and political expediency. They are stressing that Israel is the only democratic state in the Middle East friendly to the Europeans. Appeal to understanding of our problems. All sink into a void. They refuse to listen and to hear».  The time will elapse and the view of Europeans will no longer have any significance. They will be replaced by the Muslims whose opinion is well known and to talk with whom will be useless.   

Such is political and strategic reality. That is how the situation is seen  by a rank and file citizen living in Jerusalem. I do not have access to secret documents, I do not know what is going on in the Middle-Eastern, European and American corridors of power, I in general know little in this respect. But I know the Jewish and  Arab history. I know well the European history of the last century full of treachery, fatal errors and megalomania of the countries which long ago became second class and even morally Lilliputian. I observed at a close distance the disintegration of the Soviet empire. I am carefully watching a surprising but quite predictable degeneration of America. All these combined provide huge information for thought and allow making a substantiated conclusion about Israel.

Israel’s situation is better than that of Europe. In the near future it will be the only non-Muslim state in a huge region covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. To survive, Israel needs the following: 1. No territorial concessions; 2. Consolidate settlements in Judea and Samaria; 3. Solve the problem of Israeli Arabs;  4. Develop and create conceptually new effective weapons – nuclear, laser, psychotronic, cyber, etc. As for the external propaganda and the «explanation of own position», they do not deserve any hope, therefore no money and human resources should be wasted on them. Israel does not have listeners and interlocutors. Same way as Czechoslovakia did not have them in 1938.

A strong Israel will be able to survive as an unassailable island in the Islamic sea and wait until a New European Reconquista. It is unavoidable as in the history «everything that goes around comes around». How long will we have to wait?  Judge for yourselves. As mentioned, first major European countries (Germany and France) will fall under the power of Islam in the middle of the century. Another twenty years, perhaps less will take Islamization of the rest of Europe. This takes us to 2070. At the  same  time  the  historically built-in internecline muslim  wars  will  break  out.   The Reconquista in the 8-th century began eight years after the Arabs conquered Pyrenean Peninsula. The start of the next taking back of Europe will not be longer to wait. The role of the Jews in this «project» will also change. Whereas in the 8-th century they were Arab allies, in the 21-th century they will be their opponents.  Who knows, perhaps that will be a decisive factor…  Be it as it may, about the year 2080 the new Reconquista will begin. Just seventy years from our time. An  insignificant  time interval in the Jewish history.  Lehaim!

                              

Translation  of  the  article  in   Russian  dated  October, 2010   

Haim  Sokolin    haim08@012.net.il